Allahabad High Court

FAFO/62/2005 of THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. LAKHIMPUR THRU LEGAL CELL Vs SMT. SANGITA DEVI and 5 ORS. on 13 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 62 of 2005 National Lok Adalat HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. The authorized representative of Insurance Company, identified by Sri Inder Preet Singh Chadha, Advocate is present and has submitted an application requesting for

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 62 of 2005

National Lok Adalat

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The authorized representative of Insurance Company, identified by Sri Inder Preet Singh Chadha, Advocate is present and has submitted an application requesting for dismissal of appeal as withdrawn/not pressed. Copy of duly signed consent form be treated as part of this order. The contents of application read as under:- "1. This appeal when instituted had certain arguable issues but during pendency and the subsequent judgments of Apex Court as well as of this Court, have covered those issues by deciding matters against appellant and no more arguable issue is now surviving, hence appellant finds no reason to continue with this appeal and is giving consent for dismissal of appeal as not pressed.

2. The appellant has moved this application by his/her free consent and without any coercion/ pressure of any kind.

3. The whole decretal amount as awarded if not already paid shall be paid within two months from today.

4. Amount deposited at the time of filing of appeal, if not already remitted to Court below, be remitted forthwith and may be allowed to be adjusted/paid.

5. It is respectfully prayed that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed.

6. This withdrawal shall not affect any right to contest in any other cross appeal arising out of same issue."

2. In view of above, appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn/not pressed.

3. The record of Tribunal, if received, shall be remitted forthwith.

4. Let copy of this order be also transmitted to the learned Tribunal as well as claimant. (R.K.S. Chauhan, Member Adv.) (Saurabh Lavania, J.) December 13, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : S.K. Bartariya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Srivastava, Harpal Singh Chaddha, Raj Kumar Verma, Rajendra Jaiswal, Ram Asrey, Satyendra Kr. Maurya The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Lakhimpur Thru Legal Cell .....Appellant(s) Smt. Sangita Devi And 5 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead