Allahabad High Court
/12108/2025 of ARVIND KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., STAMP AND REGISTRATION DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12108 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. The grievances raised by the petitioner in the present petition with regard to non- initiation of the action by the State- respondents with regard tot he encroachment by the private respondents
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12108 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The grievances raised by the petitioner in the present petition with regard to non- initiation of the action by the State- respondents with regard tot he encroachment by the private respondents on the chak road. It is noticed that a simple application was given tot eh Sub Divisional Magistrate on 20.11.2025 and it is alleged that on the said application no action has been taken.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that in case the proceedings have been instituted under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code then a proper application should have been given to the S.D.M. concerned while an informal representation has been given by the petitioner as annexed as Annexure No.3 tot he writ petition. 3, At this stage counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and seek liberty to file a regular application before the S.D.M. concerned for redressal of his grievance.
4. In the light of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. However, it is provided that in case such an application is filed within a period of two weeks to opposite party no.3, he shall proceed to decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. December 12, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prateek Pal Singh, Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Arvind Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Stamp And Registration Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench