Allahabad High Court
/435/2025 of RAGINI THRU. HER HUSBAND AKASH KUMAR KASHYAP Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 435 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Affidavit filed by the learned AGA in the Court today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Vipin Pal, the learned counsel for the petitioner/Akash Kumar Kashyap, Sri Arun Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 435 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit filed by the learned AGA in the Court today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Vipin Pal, the learned counsel for the petitioner/Akash Kumar Kashyap, Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned State Law Officer and Sri Gaurav Awasthi, Advocate, who has put in appearance and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Ragini (Detenue) in the Court today, which is taken on record, as well as perused the record.
3. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the opposite parties to produce the petitioner Ragini before this Hon'ble Court.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to release the petitioner."
4. In terms of this Court's order dated 02.12.2025, Ragini (Detenue) and petitioner/Akash Kumar Kashyap are present before this Court duly identified by Sri Vipin Pal, Advocate and Sri Gaurav Awasthi, Advocate.
5. In terms of this Court's order dated 02.12.2025, a draft of Rs. 30,000/- has also been handed over to Ragini (Detenue) in the Court today.
6. Taking note of the statement of Ragini (Detenue) present before this Court that she does not want to accompany the petitioner/Akash Kumar Kashyap, through whom the instant petition has been filed, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition for the main relief(s) sought, quoted above.
7. The instant petition is accordingly dismissed. December 12, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, Sandeep Rawat, Vipin Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ragini Thru. Her Husband Akash Kumar Kashyap .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench