Allahabad High Court
/10344/2025 of VINAY KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10344 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. At the very outset, Sri Rao Narendra Singh, learned A.G.A. has contended that the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is the second application. He further
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10344 of 2025
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, Sri Rao Narendra Singh, learned A.G.A. has contended that the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is the second application. He further submits that the instant second application is not maintainable in view of judgement rendered by Hon'ble Apex in the matter of Bhisham Lal Verma Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in 2024 (15) SCC 282.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant could not dispute the submission advanced by learned counsel for the applicant.
3. Accordingly, it is dismissed. December 12, 2025 S.Ali Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durgesh Mishra, Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Vinay Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench