Allahabad High Court

/9942/2025 of MAHESH KUMAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 12 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9942 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed for quashing the charge sheet

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9942 of 2025

Court No. - 14

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

2. This application has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 03.12.2013 as well as summoning order dated 22.12.2017 passed in Criminal Case No. 19427 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No. 437 of 2013, under Section 447 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Faizabad (now Ayodhya).

3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants may move their discharge application through counsel within three weeks from today and, in case, any such application is filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kul Bhushan Tripathi, Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mahesh Kumar Yadav And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

7. With the above directions, this application is disposed of. December 12, 2025 VKS A482 No. 9942 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead