Allahabad High Court
/7168/2025 of SMT.RAMPYARI AND ANOTHER Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATIVE, LUCKNOW DIVISION, LUCKNOW AND OTHERS on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7168 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent Nos. 1 & 6 and Sri Avnish Kr. Singh, Advocate
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7168 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent Nos. 1 & 6 and Sri Avnish Kr. Singh, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 2 which is taken on record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the interim application of petitioners and also decide the appeal bearing No.
computer No. C202410000001867 U/S 331 U.P.Z.A. Act (Smt. Rampyari and others Vs. Jeet and others), expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the interim application filed along with aforesaid appeal.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad, Kuldeep Prakash, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey, Ratnesh Chandra Smt.Rampyari And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administrative, Lucknow Division, Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s)
1 - Additional Commissioner Administrative Lucknow Division Lucknow to consider and decide interim application pending in appeal bearing No. 1867/2024 computer No. C202410000001867 U/S 331 U.P.Z.A. Act (Smt. Rampyari and others Vs. Jeet and others) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date, report regarding sufficiency of service is received with regard to the service on respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. December 12, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7168 of 2025
(Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench