Allahabad High Court
/12110/2025 of RAJIV KUMAR Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12110 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2. 2. The grievance raised by the learned with regard to the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12110 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2.
2. The grievance raised by the learned with regard to the noncompliance of the order dated 14.08.2025 passed by the S.D.M., Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, wherein the parties have been directed to maintain status-quo and not to interfere with the property in possession of the other party or change the nature of the same.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the private respondents are not adhering to the directions issued by the S.D.M. vide order dated 14.08.2025 and are violating the same.
4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code are regular proceedings and provision of Civil Procedure Code are fully applicable and in case there is violation of interim order passed in such proceedings, cognizance can be taken under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of the C.P.C.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid facts at this stage and submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this case with liberty to move an appropriate application before the S.D.M.
6. In light of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar, Meenu Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajiv Kumar .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
the aforesaid liberty.
7. However, it is provided that in case an application for violation of the interim order dated 14.08.2025 preferred by the petitioner, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, with expedition. December 12, 2025 Muk WRIC No. 12110 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench