Allahabad High Court
/146/2025 of MAN SINGH PAL @ MANSINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 146 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.241 of 2024 under sections 333, 115(2), 77, 352, 351(2), 64(1) BNS, P.S. Safipur, District Unnao.
3. It is argued that the applicant was granted the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 17.02.2025. It is informed that the charge- sheet has been filed.
4. Considering the fact that there is no material to suggest that the applicant had not cooperated with the investigation, as such, the interim bail granted to the accused applicant is made absolute.
5. Thus, in the event of surrendering the accused before the trial court, he shall be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of the trial with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nouphil Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Alok Srivastava Man Singh Pal @ Mansingh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
6. The sureties furnished and the personal bond furnished earlier in terms of the interim order shall remain valid till the conclusion of the trial.
7. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed. December 12, 2025 VNP/- NABAIL No. 146 of 2025
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PANKAJ BHATIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench