Allahabad High Court

/12526/2025 of MANOHAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. on 12 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12526 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.149 of 2025, under Section 103(1),

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12526 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.149 of 2025, under Section 103(1), 61(2) BNS, P.S. Sadna, District Sitapur.

3. In terms of the FIR lodged through an application under Section 173(4) BNSS it was alleged that accused had committed the murder of the son of the informant and had depicted the same as an accident.

4. In the light of the said, learned counsel for the applicants draws my attention to the inquest report wherein it was expressed that the deceased died on account of an accident of a motorcycle which met with an accident with a tree. Postmortem report on record indicates only one contused injury on the right side of forehead which is the cause of death.

5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

6. Considering that prima-facie, it is a case of accident, the applicants who are in custody since 30.10.2025 and have no criminal antecedents, are entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

7. Let the applicants Manohar and Ashish be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalji Prasad Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manohar And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 12, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12526 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead