Allahabad High Court
/11672/2025 of SMT. NEELAM TIWARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 12 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11672 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3. 2. Notice to respondents no.4 to 10 is dispensed with in
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11672 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3.
2. Notice to respondents no.4 to 10 is dispensed with in view of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the official respondents to take appropriate action immediately with respect to Case Crime No. 0179 of 2025 under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, Police Station Makhi, District Unnao and to arrest the accused persons.
4. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 10.12.2025 sent by Sri Mohan Lal Singh, Senior Sub-Inspector, Police Station Makhi, Unnao, states that a final report dated 30.11.2025 has been submitted in the matter.
5. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to her.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 12, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vineet Kumar Chaurasia, Abdul Malik, Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Smt. Neelam Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench