Allahabad High Court
A482/9992/2025 of JANGLI PRASAD AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9992 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9992 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "The petitioner named above most respectfully begs to submit that for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Entire Proceedings arising out of Chargesheet No. 337/2022 dated 17.10.2022, under section 379 I.P.C. Police Station Kasimpur, District Hardoi, pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Hardoi, in Case No. 128/2023, State Vs Jangli Prasad & others', arising out of Case Crime No. 0301/2022, under section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kasimpur, District Hardoi, so far it relates to the present petitioners. It is further prayed that the entire proceedings of the aforesaid Case No. 128/2023, 'State Vs Jangli Prasad & others', pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ilnd, Hardoi, may kindly be stayed, during pendency of this petition, in the interest of justice, so far it relates with the present petitioners."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants, who are said to be on bail, has submitted that without acceding the main prayer(s) sought in the application, the instant application may be disposed of with liberty to applicants to prefer discharge application, which may be directed to be decided by the court concerned most expeditiously.
4. To the aforesaid, there is no objection.
5. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to applicants to prefer discharge application before the court concerned, which shall be considered and decided most expeditiously by the court concerned.
6. With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of finally. December 11, 2025 ML/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nisha Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Jangli Prasad And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench