Allahabad High Court
CRLP/9757/2025 of SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ SHAILENDRA BADKE Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9757 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3, and Sri Viswas Raj Saxena holding
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9757 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3, and Sri Viswas Raj Saxena holding brief of Sri Divyanshu Dubey, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 25.10.2023 bearing no.0254 of 2023, under Sections 506, 323, 471, 467, 468, 420 IPC lodged at Police Station Nagram, District Lucknow.
3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioner and respondent no.4 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated nil, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition.
4. This Court vide order dated 28.11.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise.
5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 28.11.2025 the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 18.09.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioner and respondent no.4.
6. As per the said compromise, the petitioner and respondent no.4 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably.
7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The FIR No. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Divyanshu Dubey Shailendra Kumar Singh @ Shailendra Badke .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
0254 of 2023, under Sections 506, 323, 471, 467, 468, 420 IPC lodged at Police Station Nagram, District Lucknow, is quashed. December 11, 2025 A. Katiyar CRLP No. 9757 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench