Allahabad High Court
WPIL/1246/2025 of VIJAY KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1246 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sandeep Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State and Shri Mohd. Arif Khan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1246 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Sandeep Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State and Shri Mohd. Arif Khan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the Gao Sabha.
2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of encroachment made on lands bearing Gata No.79, Rakba-0.0002 hectares and Gata No.80, Rakba- 0.0006 Hectares area 1.2650 hectare, situated at Village- Husenpur Mridang, Pargana and Tehsil- Nanpara, District- Bahraich.
3. On the basis of written instruction, learned counsel for the Gao Sabha has informed that the an order under Section 67 of UP Revenue Code was passed for removal of encroachment over the said lands, thereafter, an application for setting aside the aforesaid order was filed which is pending.
4. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed off with the direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Nanpara, Bahraich to decide the application for recall of order/application under Section 67 of UP Revenue Code, expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the affected persons. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) December 11, 2025/V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta
Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench