Allahabad High Court
A227/7089/2025 of JITENDRA SHUKLA AND ANOTHER Vs SANDEEP KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7089 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Syed Azizul Hasan Rizvi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Dilip Kumar Pathak, Advocate holding brief of Shri Satish Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7089 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Syed Azizul Hasan Rizvi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Dilip Kumar Pathak, Advocate holding brief of Shri Satish Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. The respondent nos.2-8 are proforma parties.
2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Lucknow to dispose off the application filed under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC in Regular Suit No.2534 of 2025.
3. The aforesaid suit has been filed by the respondent no.1 against the petitioners and respondent nos.2-8 for a decree of declaration and temporary injunction. On 13.11.2025, the trial court passed an ex-parte order of ad interim injunction against the defendants while issuing notice to them.
4. The trial court had issued summons of suit and notices on the application for temporary injunction to the defendants. The defendants put in appearance and filed an application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC on 19.11.2025, it was fixed for disposal on 10.12.2025 but it could not be disposed of.
5. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has no objection against issuance of direction for expeditious disposal of application filed under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC filed in Regular Suit No.2534 of 2025.
6. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed off with the direction to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Lucknow to dispose Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Syed Azizul Hasan Rizvi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Satish Kumar Sharma Jitendra Shukla And Another .....Petitioner(s) Sandeep Kumar And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
off the application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC filed in Regular Suit No.2534 of 2025, expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the affected persons. December 11, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 7089 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench