Allahabad High Court
A482/10394/2025 of POOJA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. ANOTHER on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10394 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10394 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly by pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Charge sheet no. 01/2024, dated 03.06.2024 in Criminal Case no. 107145/2024, arising our Case Crime/F.I.R no. 0008/2024, U/s 147/148/323/504/506 I.P.C, Police Station Rahimabad, District Lucknow, styled as State......Vs Pooja Devi and others, Pending before Learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Custom, Lucknow, as Contained in ANNEXURE no. 1 to this Application, during the pendency of this Application."
3. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
6. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:-
(i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Salman, S. Asan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pooja Devi And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Another .....Opposite Party(s)
compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today.
(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record.
(iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order.
(iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed.
(v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
(vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court.
(vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case.
December 11, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 10394 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench