Allahabad High Court
CRLP/9696/2025 of SHAGUN MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9696 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard. 2. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 17.11.2025, respondent no.4 Sri Surendra Singh Lodhi is present in Court who has been
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9696 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 17.11.2025, respondent no.4 Sri Surendra Singh Lodhi is present in Court who has been produced by Sri Raj Kumar, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Para, District Lucknow.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 411 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 125(b), 352, 119(2), 281, 304(2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Para, District Lucknow.
4. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 11.12.2025 given by Sri Raj Kumar, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Para, Lucknow, states that a charge sheet dated 29.11.2025 has been filed in the Court.
5. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.
6. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amandeep Singh, Ankleshwar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Shagun Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no case on merits is made out.
8. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him.
9. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 11, 2025 A. Katiyar CRLP No. 9696 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench