Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11578/2025 of MARIYAM BANO Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11578 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents no.1 to 4. 2. No notice be issued to private respondents taking
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11578 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents no.1 to 4.
2. No notice be issued to private respondents taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents no.2 and 3 to ensure fair and proper investigation of FIR No.0568 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Inayatnagar, District Ayodhya.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid FIR having been lodged on 16.11.2025, the respondent authorities are not proceeding further.
5. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Ashish Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Inayatnagar, District Ayodhya states that the statement of the victim(s) has been recorded and an endeavour would be made to conclude the investigation in a fair manner within a time frame as provided under the provisions of BNSS, 2023.
6. The aforesaid statement of learned AGA is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of.
December 11, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)
Mariyam Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench