Allahabad High Court
A227/7135/2025 of RAM KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS Vs CIVIL JUDGE JUNIOR DIVISION LALGANJ PRATAPGARH AND 3 OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7135 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Lalganj Pratapgarh has inadvertently been made party in the present petition
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7135 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Lalganj Pratapgarh has inadvertently been made party in the present petition and although, the petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India but at one place, Article 226 has been erroneously mentioned and he has made oral request for grant of permission to delete the name of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Lalganj, Pratapgarh from the array of respondents and carry out necessary corrections, forthwith.
2. The prayer made is allowed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to delete the name of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Lalganj, Pratapgarh from the array of respondents and carry out necessary correction in the memo of petition, forthwith.
4. Heard Shri Aditya Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. By means of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought the issuance of a direction to the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Lalganj, Pratapgarh to decide the Suit No.456 of 2017 (Santosh Kumar and Ors. Vs. Ramkumar and Ors.) pending before him, expeditiously.
6. Keeping in view the nature of the relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is hereby dispensed with. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Ram Kumar Mishra And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge Junior Division Lalganj Pratapgarh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Aforesaid suit was filed by the respondent no.1, 2 and 3 against the petitioners for cancellation of sale deed dated 18.02.2015. Petitioners filed their written statement and thereafter, issues were framed on 15.05.2019. Primarily, issue nos.2, 3 and 4 were decided on 06.01.2020 and 12.02.2020. Thereafter, the matter is still at the stage of plaintiff's evidence.
8. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of by issuing a direction to the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Lalganj, Pratapgarh to decide the Suit No.456 of 2017 (Santosh Kumar and Ors. Vs. Ramkumar and Ors.) pending before him, expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and conclude the same by fixing dates at short intervals. December 11, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 7135 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench