Allahabad High Court
A227/7150/2025 of JAYENDRA KATIYAR AND ANOTHER Vs BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. SECY. AND 5 OTHERS on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7150 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7150 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Revision No.1389 of 2016, "Babu Ram and others Vs. Shanti Niketan and others", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1- Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.1389 of 2016, "Babu Ram and others Vs. Shanti Niketan and others", expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 11, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar, Shraddha Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Jayendra Katiyar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Secy. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench