Allahabad High Court
A482/10498/2025 of DEEPAK YADAV ALIAS DEEPAK KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 11 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10498 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Krishna Gopal, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10498 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Krishna Gopal, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party no.2 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Case No.143913 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No.0094 of 2023 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station - Manak Nagar, District - Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Fazal Abbas Rizvi, Mohd.Imran, Murtaza Hasnain Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Yadav Alias Deepak Kumar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 11, 2025 GauraV/- A482 No. 10498 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench