Allahabad High Court
A227/7121/2025 of RAJ KUMAR SINGH Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, AMETHI AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7121 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7121 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Amethi, to decide interim relief application filed for implementation of order dated 08.07.2025, pending in Revision No. 275 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. 202554047100000422) - Raj Kumar Singh Vs. Vakil Khan and Others, U/S 48(1) of he U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Amethi, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Amethi, is directed to decide interim relief application filed for implementation of order dated 08.07.2025, pending in Revision No. 275 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. 202554047100000422)
- Raj Kumar Singh Vs. Vakil Khan and Others, U/S 48(1) of he U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of service report regarding service upon opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Raj Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Amethi And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench