Allahabad High Court

A227/7120/2025 of DHARMRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS Vs UPZILADHIKARI, TEHSIL TARABGANJ, GONDA AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7120 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Adarsh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7120 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Adarsh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Tarabganj, District - Gonda, for expeditious disposal of Case No. 9351 of 2025 - Dharmraj and Others Vs. Parasram Singh and Others, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Tarabganj, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Case No. 9351 of 2025 - Dharmraj and Others Vs. Parasram Singh and Others, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of.

December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Kumar Maurya, Alka Rani, Ambrish Kumar, Shubham Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Dharmraj Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) Upziladhikari, Tehsil Tarabganj, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead