Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12029/2025 of ALI AHAMAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12029 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard Sri Rahul Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Vikram Dutt Pandey holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12029 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Heard Sri Rahul Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1, 2 and 3
and Sri Vikram Dutt Pandey holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta for he Gaon Sabha.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The grievance raised by the petitioner is with regard to encroachment made by private respondents over gata No.s 795, area 0.3360 hect. (main road), 793 area 0.0730 hect. ( Rasta), 798 area 0.0400 hect. (chak marg), 823 are a0.3400 hect. (chak marg) and gata No.825 area 0.0300 hectare (Drain), situated in Village Beerpur, Tehsil Payagpur, District Bahraich.
2. It is submitted that aforesaid land is recorded as Gaon Sabha land and being utilized for public purposes and despite the representations given by the petitioner no action has been taken. Learned counsel or the petitioner submits that the State- respondents may be directed to initiate proceedings against the private respondents in accordance with law.
3. It is noticed that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate supplication for removal of the encroachment under Section 26 as well as 67 of U.P. Revenue Code.
4. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Shukla, Shivam Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ali Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Accordingly, considering the grievance raised by the petitioner, it is provided that in case appropriate application is moved by the petitioner under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code before the competent authority the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
5. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of.
6. December 10, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 12029 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench