Allahabad High Court
CRLP/5854/2025 of SUNAINA KUMARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. /PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5854 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 3. Learned A.G.A. for the respondents No.1 to 3 and Shri
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5854 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
3. Learned A.G.A. for the respondents No.1 to 3 and Shri Mohd. Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 are present.
4. The instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the impugned F.I.R. dated 30.12.2024 registered as Case Crime No.586 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 351(3), 352 of B.N.S., P.S. Gosaiganj, District Lucknow South (Commissionerate Lucknow), a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition.
5. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions sent by Shubham Pratap, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Gosaiganj, District Lucknow dated 13.11.2025 states that a charge sheet dated 13.11.2025 has been submitted in the court.
6. Learned A.G.A. further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.
7. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R. and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Mohd. Ali, Tanzeem Fatima Sunaina Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287.
8. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R. vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no case on merits is made out.
9. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him. December 10, 2025 S. Shivhare CRLP No. 5854 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench