Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12032/2025 of VINOD KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12032 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing counsel for the State while notice on behalf of respondent No.5- Gram Sabha of the village
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12032 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing counsel for the State while notice on behalf of respondent No.5- Gram Sabha of the village concerned has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present writ petition the petitioners have sought a direction to Upziladhikari, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gonda to execute order dated 2.9.2024 passed in Case No.T202108300604450 under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code.
4. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and seeks liberty to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. December 10, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Vinod Kumar Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench