Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14244/2025 of RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS on 10 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14244 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14244 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. Present petition under Article of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's claim for providing the entire service benefits treating the initial appointment on 20.06.1985 as substantive and for granting of promotion and pay scales with effect from 20.06.1985 along with consequential benefits.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on judgment rendered by this Court in Pratap Narain Pandey v. State of U.P. & others [Writ Petition No.4031(S/S) of 2001] as well as decision in State of U.P. and others v. Jag Prasad Chaubey rendered in Special Appeal No.191 of 2024.

4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Shikha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajendra Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Chairman, Board of Revenue U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order in the light of aforesaid decisions, in case the same are applicable upon petitioner.

5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 10, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14244 of 2025

(Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead