Allahabad High Court
A482/10342/2025 of INDRAJEET YADAV @ INDRAJEET Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10342 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following main
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10342 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
3
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following main relief(s):- "Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set-aside/quash the entire criminal proceedings arising out of Summon Order Dated 04.07.2024 passed in Crl. Case No.60464/2024 State vs Indrajeet passed by the Court of Learned Judicial Magitrate-III, Lucknow pursuant to Chargesheet No. 01 Dated 28.06.2021 U/s 420,406,506 I.P.C. arising out of FIR No. 0653 of 2020, Dated 30.12.2020 Under Sections 420,406,506 I.P.C. lodged at P.S. Sarojini Nagar, District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. It is, further prayed kindly direct to learned court below not to take any coercive action against applicants, as applicants pledged themselves to obey all processes, order passed by Learned Court below in respect of above noted case. Otherwise, applicant shall suffer an irreparable loss and enormous injury."
3. Considering the facts of the case as also the punishment provided for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 506 IPC as also the observations Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adesh Kumar, Ashish Chaurasia, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Shubham Chaurasiya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Indrajeet Yadav @ Indrajeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment passed in the case(s) of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2024) 10 SCC 690, without observing anything on merits, the present application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer an application in terms of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (Supra), which shall be decided most expeditiously, and also thereafter to prefer an application seeking discharge based upon the judgment passed in the case of Delhi Race Club (Supra) and other law, which shall be considered and decided by the concerned court by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. December 10, 2025 ML/- A482 No. 10342 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench