Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11659/2025 of RAHIS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11659 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents. 2. No notice be issued to private respondents taking into
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11659 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents.
2. No notice be issued to private respondents taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to ensure fair and proper investigation of FIR No.0402 of 2025 under Sections 109, 110, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Purva, District Unnao and to arrest the accused persons.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid FIR having been lodged on 13.11.2025, the respondent authorities are not proceeding further.
5. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Rameshwar Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Purva, District Unnao, dated Nil states that the investigation is being carried out and an endeavour would be made to conclude the same in a fair manner within a period of six weeks. He further states that the statement of the victim(s) would be recorded within ten days from today.
6. The aforesaid statement of learned AGA is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. December 10, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Rahis .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench