Allahabad High Court

A227/7059/2025 of SHYAM SUNDAR TIWARI Vs ANIL KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS on 10 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7059 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Niyaj Ahmad, the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Additional

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7059 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Shri Niyaj Ahmad, the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Original Suit No.984 of 2020 titled Shyam Sundar Tiwari v. Purushottam Tiwari and Anr. expeditiously.

3. Keeping in view the nature of relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with.

4. The aforesaid suit has been filed by the petitioner for a decree of partition. The suit is amongst decedents of a common ancestor. Although the order-sheet of trial Court shows that on numerous occasions, the suit could not proceed because of strike of Advocates but on several dates, the hearing has been adjourned without assigning any reason. Early disposal of the partition suit amongst members of the same family, would be expedient in the interest of justice.

5. The instant petition is disposed off by issuing a direction to Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Original Suit No.984 of 2020 titled Shyam Sundar Tiwari v. Purushottam Tiwari and Anr. expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. December 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) :

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shyam Sundar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Anil Kumar And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead