Allahabad High Court

WRIC/11775/2025 of VIJAY KUMAR Vs DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE U.P. HEADQUARTERS LKO. on 10 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11775 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Shri Raman Mishra, Advocate files his Vakalatnama on behalf of petitioner, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 11775 of 2025

Court No. - 3

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.

HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Shri Raman Mishra, Advocate files his Vakalatnama on behalf of petitioner, which is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "i. To issue order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent DGP of Uttar Pradesh to decide the application dated 11.11.2025 given under section 75 of B.S.A. (Annexure no.1) and provide Certified Copies of the documents sought by the petitioner within 15 day's or at an earlier possible date as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice."

4. Accordingly, we direct the Director General of Police, U.P. being respondent herein to decide the application dated 11.11.2025 under Section 75 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from date. The authority shall keep in mind the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini Vs. Baljit Singh & others; Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.3543 of 2020 while passing the order.

5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

December 10, 2025 Anand/-

Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person, Pramendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Director General Of Police U.P. Headquarters Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead