Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14229/2025 of RAM PRATAP Vs DIRECTOR SPORTS , SPORTS DIRECTORATE U.P. KHEL BHAWAN , LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14229 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14229 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- " (i) ISSUE, a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to provide the pension as well as pensionery benefits under the old pension scheme to the petitioner from the date of his retirement after counting the services rendered by him regularly on the basis of daily wages w.e.f. 05.07.1989 till his regularization i.e. 02.02.2006 in the light of the Judgement and order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Hon'ble in WRIT A No. 731 of 2024 (Jai Ram Sharma Versus State of U.P. & ors) in accordance with law.
(ii) ISSUE, a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to add/ count the petitioner's services Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Pratap .....Petitioner(s) Director Sports , Sports Directorate U.P. Khel Bhawan , Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
rendered by him regularly on the basis of daily wages on the post of Ground Staff w.e.f 05.07.1989 till his regularization i.e. 02.02.2006 and give him all consequential service benefits under the old pension scheme in accordance with law."
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that his case is completely covered by judgment rendered by this Court in Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024]
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. Director Sports, Sport Directorate, Uttar Pradesh Khel Bhawan, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order in light of aforesaid judgment, in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 10, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14229 of 2025
(Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench