Allahabad High Court
A227/7118/2025 of UMESH CHANDRA AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER, PRAYAGRAJ DIVISION, PRAYAGRAJ AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7118 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7118 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, to decide Interim Relief Application filed in Case No. C 202502000002200 - Umesh Chandra and Others Vs. Badama Devi and Others, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, is directed to decide Interim Relief Application filed in Case No. C 202502000002200 - Umesh Chandra and Others Vs. Badama Devi and Others, expeditiously, say within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of service report regarding service upon opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Umesh Chandra And Others .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench