Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14243/2025 of ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAWA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. AYUSH DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 10 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14243 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) A writ, order or

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14243 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide full salary and other allowance to the petitioner for the period of 22.09.2022 through 16.07.2025 (on which the petitioner was under suspension) with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice.

(ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide the benefit of Yearly Increments for the year of 2023-25 with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice.

(iii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide the Yearly Bonus' for the year of 2023-25 with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arun Kumar Srivastawa .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Ayush Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

3. It has been submitted that earlier inquiry proceedings were instituted against petitioner vide charge-sheet 21.09.2022 which culminated in the final order dated 16.07.2025 in which petitioner stood exonerated and has attained finality but the aforesaid benefits have not yet been paid.

4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.3 i.e. Director, Ayurvedic Services, U.P. Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 10, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14243 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead