Allahabad High Court
A227/7104/2025 of JHINNA @ JHINNALAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 10 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7104 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7104 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ahodhya, for expeditious disposal of Case No. 1475 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C 202504000001475), under Section 333 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ahodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Case No. 1475 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C 202504000001475), under Section 333 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of.
December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Jhinna @ Jhinnalal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench