Allahabad High Court
/1935/2025 of AJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1935 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed for the following main
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1935 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash/set aside the Charge Sheet No. 493 of 2025 dated 24-08-2025 as well as summoning order dated 13-10-2025 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, District-Kheri in U/S-109(1), 352 of B.N.S. & 27/30 of Arms Act, Police Station-Kotwali Sadar, District- Lakhimpur Kheri, which is contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition, in the interest of justice.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant, who is said to be on bail, has submitted that without acceding the main prayer(s) sought in the application, the instant application may be disposed of with liberty to applicant to prefer discharge application, which may be directed to be decided by the court concerned most expeditiously.
4. To the aforesaid, there is no objection.
5. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to applicant to prefer discharge application before the court concerned which shall be considered and decided most expeditiously by the court concerned.
6. With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of finally. December 9, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.K. Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ajeet Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench