Allahabad High Court
/14217/2025 of VISHNU KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. ANIMAL HUSBANDRY U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14217 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14217 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide all the service benefits (including the arrears of salary) from 05.07.1997 to 27.08.2003 when he was entitled for salary benefits in the interest of Justice.
ii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 i.e., Additional Director (Grade II), Department of Animal Husbandry, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, to decide the representation dated 25.02.2025 contained as annexure no. 11 to writ petition within stipulated time framed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Chetan Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vishnu Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Animal Husbandry U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench