Allahabad High Court
A227/7072/2025 of SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7072 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Surya Kant Singh is present for respondent No.4 - Kanpur
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7072 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Surya Kant Singh is present for respondent No.4 - Kanpur Development Authority.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to respondent No. 6 -Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Revision No.13 L.R. 2002-2003, District Kanpur (Narendra Bajpai VS. Surya Balak Shastri and others) under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 6 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 6 -Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.13 L.R. 2002-2003, District Kanpur (Narendra Bajpai VS. Surya Balak Shastri and others) under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Preeti Devi, Kanchan Verma (Km.), Sudhanshu Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surya Kant Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench