Allahabad High Court
/14204/2025 of SMT. MAYA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 4 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14204 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14204 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No- 4 & 5 to take decision on the representation dated-02.09.2025 made by petitioner for payment of arrears of salary and other service benefits due of her husband Late Ajeet Pratap Singh Police Constable Railway died in harness on-15.06.2023 which was required to be paid after quashing of the order of dismissal dated-31.08.2010 in Writ A No-4408 of 2012 decided on-08.03.2022 "consequence to follow" and also consider the recommendation made by Additional Superintendent of Police, Railway, Lucknow of the Office of Upper Police Mahanideshak, Railway U.P., Lucknow dated-11.09.2025 for its payment contained in Annexure No-1 & 2 respectively."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.5 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Railway, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shri Prakash Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Maya Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 9, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 14204 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench