Allahabad High Court
/7096/2025 of RAVI PRATAP CHAURASIA Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7096 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while Sri Pankaj Gupta has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7096 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while Sri Pankaj Gupta has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.3.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to respondent No.1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Second Appeal No.2225/2023, District Deoria, Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. Ravi Pratap and others, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Second Appeal No.2225/2023, District Deoria, "Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. Ravi Pratap and others", expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.)
Ravi Pratap Chaurasia .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench