Allahabad High Court
/1990/2025 of RAVINDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1990 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Shafat Fatima, Advocate holding brief of Shri Arshad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1990 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Shafat Fatima, Advocate holding brief of Shri Arshad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in both the cases in which he was roped only on one arrest and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court concerned.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in both the cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is a poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District- Lucknow are as follows:-
(i) Case crime No. 171/2025, Under Sections- 317(2), 305(A), 331(4) B.N.S., Police Station- Indira Nagar, District- Lucknow.
(ii) Case Crime No. 139/2025, Under Sections- 317(2), 305(A), 331(4) B.N.S., Police Station- Indira Nagar, District- Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.
5. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arshad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravindra Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. December 9, 2025 DiVYa NA528 No. 1990 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench