Allahabad High Court

/14195/2025 of MAN MOHAN SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY.-CUM PRIN. SECY. FINANCE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 9 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14195 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14195 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding opposite party No.04 to Pay/provide the benefit of medical reimbursement of Rs. 1,59,081/- + Rs.62,221/- + 65,000/-(Total Rs. 2,86,302/-Two Lakhs, Eighty Six Thousands, Three hundred Two Rupees), in terms of Government order dated 07/10 October, 2011 as petitioner was retired on 31.01.2012 from the post of Assistant Audit Officer, within some stipulated time period."

3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. District Audit Officer, Co-operative Societies and Panchayat Audit, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. In case petitioner is found entitled for the said benefits, actual Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Man Mohan Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy.-Cum Prin. Secy. Finance Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

payment thereof, shall be ensured within a period of four weeks thereafter.

4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 9, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 14195 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead