Allahabad High Court
/7079/2025 of DHRUV CHANDRA Vs LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) COURT NO 28 SULTANPUR AND 2 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7079 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Raghvendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7079 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Raghvendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.28, Sultanpur to decide O.S. No.299 of 2005 (Dhruv Chandra Vs. Ashok Kumar & Anr.).
3. Keeping in view the nature of the relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is hereby dispensed with.
4. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has wrongly impleaded the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.28, Sultanpur as respondent in the petition and upon his oral request, he is permitted to strike out the name of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.28, Sultanpur as respondent from the memo of the petition, during the course of the day.
5. The aforesaid suit was filed by the petitioner in the year 2005. The examination-in-chief of the petitioner was concluded in the year 2012. His cross-examination commenced in the year 2022 and the same is yet to be completed. Meanwhile, the petitioner has attained the age of 68 years.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid fact, the instant petition is allowed.
7. Direction is issued to the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.28, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra Singh, Shubham Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Dhruv Chandra .....Petitioner(s) Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No 28 Sultanpur And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Sultanpur to proceed with the trial of O.S. No.299 of 2005 (Dhruv Chandra Vs. Ashok Kumar & Anr.), expeditiously and conclude the same at the earliest by denying any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals.
December 9, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 7079 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench