Allahabad High Court
/11899/2025 of RATNAKAR TIWARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ AND 5 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11899 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.K. Khare, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P., Shri Anindya Shastri, the learned Standing
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11899 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.K. Khare, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P., Shri Anindya Shastri, the learned Standing Counsel for the State Election Commission and Shri Dhananjay Kumar Tripathi, Advocate who propose to file an application for impleadment but he has been denied the liberty to do so in view of the order being passed.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the respondents to take a decision for creating another polling booth for Village Panchayat Gedsar, Tehsil- Tarabganj, Gonda.
3. On the basis of written instructions received from SDM, Tarabganj, Gonda, the learned Standing Counsel has stated that presently a revision of Panchayat voters list is going on and a draft will be published on 23.12.2025. After finalization of voters list, booths will be fixed. Therefore, it will not be possible to take a decision on the petitioner's representation at this stage.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed at this stage. In case the petitioner is aggrieved after finalization of voters list and declaration of polling booths, he may file a fresh petition at the appropriate stage.
December 9, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, Ved Prakash Patel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anindya Shastri (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ratnakar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench