Allahabad High Court
/11498/2025 of SUMIT PATHAK Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11498 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Arjun Singh Somvanshi, learned counsel, who files
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11498 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Arjun Singh Somvanshi, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him under law.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 9, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Sumit Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench