Allahabad High Court
/7039/2025 of SHIV KUMAR Vs BHAGIRAM AND OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7039 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. C. M. Application No.nil of 2025 for amendment. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Mohan Singh is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7039 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
C. M. Application No.nil of 2025 for amendment.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Mohan Singh is present for respondent No.12.
2. The cause shown is sufficient. Application is allowed.
3. The petitioner/applicant is permitted to carry out the amendment during course of the day. Order on Memo
1. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Mohan Singh is present for respondent No.12.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to respondent No. 1-Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Appeal No.252/2006-07 (Bhagiram and others Vs. Shiv Kumar and others) under Section 331 (3) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 -Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Appeal No.252/2006-07 (Bhagiram and others Vs. Shiv Kumar and others) under Section 331 (3) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neera Yadav, Riya Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mohan Singh Shiv Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Bhagiram And Others .....Respondent(s)
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7039 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench