Allahabad High Court
/11584/2025 of ABHISHEK CHATRUVEDI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO AND OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11584 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondent State. 2. Under challenge is the notice dated 17.10.2025, a copy of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11584 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondent State.
2. Under challenge is the notice dated 17.10.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, issued by the Sub-District Magistrate, Maharajganj, Raebareli in Case No.228 of 2025, under Section 129(G), 130 B.N.S.S., Police Station Bachhrawan, Raebareli.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner intends to submit reply to the impugned notice dated 17.10.2025 and prays that his reply may be considered by the competent authority, in accordance with law under relevant rules, within a time specified by this Court. To the aforesaid prayer, learned A.G.A. has no objection.
4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit his reply to the impugned notice dated 17.10.2025. In case such a reply is submitted within ten days from the date of issuance of a certified copy of this order, the same shall be decided by the competent authority by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, which could be decided within a period of four weeks thereafter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalu Prasad Bhatt, Virandra Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Abhishek Chatruvedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
5. It is made clear that the Court has not gone into the merits of the case. December 9, 2025 Shukla CRLP No. 11584 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench