Allahabad High Court
/14194/2025 of UMA NIVAS BAJPAI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL HEALTH FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14194 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned state counsel for opposite parties 1,3,4 and 5 and Mr. Anurag Srivastava learned counsel for opposite party No.2. 2. Petition has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14194 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned state counsel for opposite parties 1,3,4 and 5 and Mr. Anurag Srivastava learned counsel for opposite party No.2.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the opposite parties to provide 10% due GPF (General Provident Fund) amount which is about 77,044/ Rs. with 18% interest on the delayed payment.
ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the opposite parties to pay due GPF (General Provident Fund) amount with interest @ 18% interest on the delayed payment, which is not been paid since 31.12.2023 on which date the Petitioner was retired from service."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite parties collectively. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Umesh Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anurag Srivastava (Manish Mathur,J.) Uma Nivas Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health Family Welfare Deptt. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench