Allahabad High Court
/1240/2025 of MOHD. AHMAD RAZA @ MO. AHAMED RAZA Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS on 9 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1240 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Afzal Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State. 2. By means of the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1240 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Afzal Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State.
2. By means of the present petition filed in the public interest, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of encroachment made on Gata No.612 area 0.0730 hectare sitauted at Village- Lauki Bhopatpur Chowki, Pargana- Nanpra, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Bahraich which is registered as Khalihan in the revenue record.
4. On the basis of written instruction dated 01.12.2025 duly signed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Bahraich placed before this Court by the learned Standing Counsel, it has been informed that the land in question was inspected and it has been found that there is no encroachment over the same.
5. The photocopy of the aforesaid instruction is taken on record.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid fact that the allegation of encroachment could not be established during the inspection of the said land, therefore, the petition stands dismissed. December 9, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Afzal Hasan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Mohd. Ahmad Raza @ Mo. Ahamed Raza .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench