Allahabad High Court

/7077/2025 of NAYAK MUNNA PANDIT Vs THE U.O.I. REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND 6 OTHERS on 9 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7077 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Anu Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Varun Pandey, learned Counsel for Union of India. 2. By means of the present petition filed under Article

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7077 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Ms. Anu Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Varun Pandey, learned Counsel for Union of India.

2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Armed Forces Tribunal to take necessary steps for the expeditious disposal of O.A. No.744 of 2025; Nayak Pandit Vs. Union of India and Ors.

3. Learned counsel for the Union of India has raised a preliminary objection that the present petition is not maintainable in view of the provisions contained under Article 227(4) of the Constitution of India.

4. Article 227(4) of the Constitution of India provides that nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a High Court powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces.

5. In view of the aforesaid specific provisions contained in Article 227(4) of the Constitution of India, this petition seeking issuance of direction to the Armed Forces Tribunal to take necessary steps for the expeditious disposal of O.A. No.744 of 2025; Nayak Pandit Vs. Union of India and Ors. is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. December 9, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anu Kumari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Nayak Munna Pandit .....Petitioner(s) The U.O.I. Represented By The Secy. Ministry Of Defence New Delhi And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead