Allahabad High Court
WRIA/4293/2023 of HARI RAM SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MAHILA KALYAM U.P. LKO AND 3 OTHERS on 8 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4293 of 2023 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed seeking following main prayer:- I.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4293 of 2023 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed seeking following main prayer:- I. Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 07-7-2021 passed by Director of Mahila Kalyan Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Opposite party no. 2 to this writ petition as contained in Annexure No.4 to this Writ Petition.
II. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant the pension and other retirement benefit to the petitioner counting the services rendered on ad-hoc basis by the petitioner for the purposes of computation of qualifying services for grant of pension and other retiral benefit and to pass appropriate order for payment of full pension and other consequential benefits within period specified by this Hon'ble Court. Application has been filed seeking withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh in view of fact that order dated 13.09.2020 could not be challenged. In view of averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 8, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Nauman, Anamika Tiwari, Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Hari Ram Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Mahila Kalyam U.P. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench