Allahabad High Court

WRIA/4293/2023 of HARI RAM SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MAHILA KALYAM U.P. LKO AND 3 OTHERS on 8 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4293 of 2023 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed seeking following main prayer:- I.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4293 of 2023 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed seeking following main prayer:- I. Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 07-7-2021 passed by Director of Mahila Kalyan Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Opposite party no. 2 to this writ petition as contained in Annexure No.4 to this Writ Petition.

II. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant the pension and other retirement benefit to the petitioner counting the services rendered on ad-hoc basis by the petitioner for the purposes of computation of qualifying services for grant of pension and other retiral benefit and to pass appropriate order for payment of full pension and other consequential benefits within period specified by this Hon'ble Court. Application has been filed seeking withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh in view of fact that order dated 13.09.2020 could not be challenged. In view of averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 8, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Nauman, Anamika Tiwari, Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Hari Ram Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Mahila Kalyam U.P. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead